Why do we define copy constructor and overloaded assignment operator separately when both of these are available by default?

Started by Koby, November 17, 2016, 07:04:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Troy

Hello everyone, I would like to ask you a little problem that has bothered me for quite a long time, why do we define copy constructor and overloaded assignment operator separately when both of these are available by default? Thank you kindly to answer me as soon as possible.